 | LawyerBuzz.com Navigation | |
|
|
| |
| Constitutional Interpretation: The Basic Questions | 
 enlarge | Authors: Sotirios A. Barber, James E. Fleming
Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA
Category: Book
List Price: $29.95
Buy New: $20.95
You Save: $9.00 (30%)
Buy New/Used from $20.93
Avg. Customer Rating:  (1 reviews)
Sales Rank: 349057
Languages: English (Unknown), English (Original Language), English (Published)
Media: Paperback
Number Of Items: 1
Pages: 208
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.7
Dimensions (in): 9.1 x 5.9 x 0.6
ISBN: 0195328582
Dewey Decimal Number: 342
EAN: 9780195328585
ASIN: 0195328582
Publication Date: July 5, 2007
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
Ronald Dworkin famously argued that fidelity in interpreting the Constitution as written calls for a fusion of constitutional law and moral philosophy. Barber and Fleming take up that call, arguing for a philosophic approach to constitutional interpretation. In doing so, they systematically critique the competing approaches - textualism, consensualism, originalism, structuralism, doctrinalism, minimalism, and pragmatism - that aim and claim to avoid a philosophic approach. Constitutional Interpretation: The Basic Questions illustrates that these approaches cannot avoid philosophic reflection and choice in interpreting the Constitution. Barber and Fleming contend that fidelity in constitutional interpretation requires a fusion of philosophic and other approaches, properly understood. Within such a fusion, interpreters would begin to think of text, consensus, intentions, structures, and doctrines not as alternatives to, but as sites of philosophic reflection about the best understanding of our constitutional commitments. Constitutional Interpretation: The Basic Questions examines the fundamental inquiries that arise in interpreting constitutional law. In doing so, the authors survey the controversial and intriguing questions that have stirred constitutional debate in the United States for over two centuries, such as: how and for what ends should governmental institutions and powers be arranged; what does the Constitution mean under general circumstances and how should it be interpreted during concrete controversies; and finally how do we decide what our constitution means and who ultimately decides its meaning.
|
| Customer Reviews:
Cogently clears away some of the nonsense November 11, 2007
7 out of 7 found this review helpful
Barber and Fleming argue in this book that all approaches to constitutional interpretation have to be grounded in a certain amount of philosophical argument. Their inspiration is Ronald Dworkin's work with his noted call for a "moral" reading of the U.S. Constitution. Barber and Fleming prefer the term "philosophic approach". What they are simply saying is that there is no approach to constitutional interpretation that is not grounded on presuppositions or assumptions that are extratextual and philosophical in nature. And in many case, these assumptions are not only made without argument, they are simply unstated.
Let me be clear about some aspects of this book. This is not an attempt to justify the readings that Dworkin has made about the Constituition. It is a comparison of his theory of interpretation with
what the authors call textualism, consensualism, narrow originalism, broad originalism, structuralism, doctrinalism, minimalism and pragmatism. Barber and Fleming are claiming that some combination(s) of the above approaches along with their philosophic approach is necessary to honestly interpret the constitution. You will not come away from this book with a methodology to apply. You will come away with a much greater appreciation of the problems involved in interpreting the Constitution.
On page 26-28 they discuss a thought experiment of Dworkin's that demonstated his distinction between concepts and conceptions. Dworkin argues that, in order to be faithful to the Constituion, judges need to recognize that the ends mentioned in the Constitution (general welfare, due process, etc.) are concepts. Judges have conceptions of those ends that may or may not be the best conceptions. That point is where the moral or philosophical argument must come in.
For example, there have been many critics, throughout our history, who feel that judges should avoid overturning legislative decisions because to do so is undemocratic. These critics (Rehnquist and Bork among many others) assume that the Constitution created a certain type of democratic government. It may or may not have. The point that Barber and Fleming are making is that neither Rehnquist nor Bork have bothered to make the argument for their ideas about the type of democracy that we have. This same argument is used against the presumptions about democracy that underlie Michael Perry's consensualism, the presumptions about "the regulatory bindedness" of the different types of originalism, etc.
Let's use that last idea as a means of giving you and example of the type of argument that Barber and Fleming are making. They argue that there is an "originalist premise" (the following is based on pp. 104-107). This is the idea that some type of originalism is necessary in order to be faithful to the Constitution. Originalist want to emphasize the "bindingness" of the Constitution. Without this regulatory bindingness, originalists fear that activist judges will impose whatever decisions they want on the public. (Let us put aside the historical observation that this is a cyclic complaint that right now is starting to change from having liberal judges be the "activists" to a period where conservative judges will be seen in that role.) Barber and Fleming feel we can either focus on the ends (concepts) or the conceptions of the Framers. If we focus on the conceptions that the Framers themselves held of these ends then we turn them into autocrats who would have us follow their ideas about,e.g., cruel and unusual punishment rather than work out own best understanding of that same thing. It was common during the founding period to throw people who could not pay their debts into jail. Do we really want to be held forever that their contemporary conception of cruel and unusual? Barber and Fleming are proposing instead that we focus on the concept itself, that we recognize that all conceptions of that concept are open to question and have to be justified.
Basically, Barber and Fleming are merely calling us to an understanding of the nature of the work that is constitutional interpretation. They even mention the possibility that there may be multiple approaches to that task that are equally justifiable. They are suggesting that we have an open and honest debate about our Constitution instead of pretending that we can avoid all of the philosophical and moral issues involved in any interpretation.
I can only concur. This is a wonderful book. They write lucidly about difficult issues, they pay attention to an extraordinary number of thinkers and they are fair to all of them. For anyone appoaching the study of constitutional history and law, this is an essential book.
|
|
|
The Lawsuit and Self Help Legal Law Book Store From LawyerBuzz.comInternational Orders & Shipping
We can ship to virtually any address in the world. Note that there are restrictions on some products, and some products cannot be shipped to international destinations.
Shipping Restrictions
Warranty issues and manufacturer restrictions prevent us from shipping certain products to all geographical locations. You'll be notified while placing your order if we're unable to ship specific items to the address you've selected.
International Addresses
The following items can be shipped to destinations outside the U.S.:
* books*
* DVDs
* music
* VHS videos
Additionally, some software, tools, and kitchen items can be shipped to the following countries:
* Australia
* Austria
* Denmark
* Finland
* France
* Germany
* Japan
* Ireland
* Italy
* Netherlands
* New Zealand
* Sweden
* United Kingdom
These items can be shipped only via Priority International Shipping and are subject to an import fees deposit.
*Note: Books that require special handling because they are extremely heavy (for example, multi-volume sets) cannot be shipped outside the U.S. If this is the case, it will be noted on the product detail page.
When you place an order, we will estimate shipping and delivery dates for you based on the availability of your items and the shipping options you choose. Shipping date estimates will appear in the order form. After placing your order, you will see both shipping and delivery date estimates in the order confirmation e-mail and in the order summary in Your Account.
Calculating Cost
Shipping costs depend upon the method and option you choose.
If you choose to group items into as few shipments as possible, you'll be charged for one regular per-shipment fee, as well as a per-item fee for each item in that shipment.
If you choose to ship items as soon as they become available, we'll charge you full per-shipment fees for each shipment as well as a per-item fee for each item.
Please also note that the shipping rates for many items we sell are weight-based. The weight of any such item can be found on its detail page. To reflect the policies of the shipping companies we use, all weights will be rounded up to the next full pound. |
|
|
| | |